Candidates offer views on government transparency, right to know

The Montana Newspaper Association surveyed candidates for the state legislature, Public Service Commission and statewide offices about their positions on government accountability, transparency and the right to know.

Of 281 candidates receiving survey, 111 responded, or about 40%. Among respondents -including Republicans, Democrats, and Independents, from Butte to Wibaux-there is a consensus that the right to know is imperative for our state's democracy. 

While the low return rate is disappointing, we appreciate those who responded during this busy campaign season. A vibrant democracy relies on open discussion about the ideals of transparency and participation embodied in the Montana Constitution. 

Here's a summary of responses:

Question 1: If elected, would you support legislation to add government accountability mechanisms to the right to know, such as time limits for responses or guaranteed attorney fees for successful plaintiffs litigating right to know matters? Are there other policies you would support on this issue?

Overwhelmingly, 84% of respondents support at least one of these proposals. Jane Weber, HD19 candidate in Great Falls, stated: "The Montana Constitution ensures the public's right to observe deliberations and decisions of its public bodies or state government officials/agencies." Link Neimark, SD5 candidate in the Kalispell area: "Transparency is critical to an honest and efficient government." 

Candidates hesitant to support these proposals noted concerns about language, timeliness and constraints they could put on the government.